Home >

Nike Was Brought To Court On Suspicion Of Trademark Infringement By Lontex

2019/1/9 14:27:00 69

SportswearNikeBrand

Nike settled in trademark disputes again. On the last day of 2018, the sports giant received a complaint from a US colleague.

According to the world clothing shoes and hats net, Pennsylvania, USA

Sportswear

Producer Lontex direction

Nike

The lawsuit was alleged that the latter infringed the company's registered trademark "Cool Compression" in advance, and was also used in the sports compression clothing product line.

Lontex pointed out that Nike used the trademark to earn more than 40 million US dollars, and therefore prosecuted for trademark infringement, damage to sales, misleading advertising and unfair competition, and asked the court to permanently prohibit Nike from using the trademark and seek compensation for the amount.

At present, neither Nike nor Lontex has publicly commented on this case. The Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania has accepted the case.

At the same time, the Lontex legal team submitted a 21 page petition to the court.

Since June 2007, Lontex has launched the "Cool Compression" product line, which is registered as sportswear and accessories.

brand

It claims to have sold more than forty thousand related products, including compressed shorts, shirts, socks and tights.

The document showed that Lontex had sent a warning letter to Nike before proceeding.

Nike responded that it would stop using the phrase "Cool Compression".

But since then, Nike has not stopped using the trademark when it knows that Lontex has obtained the US federal trademark registration, and sells these products through distributors and direct channels.

The Lontex lawyer team said that Nike had used the trademark suspected of infringement in the "Nike Pro" series as early as October 2015. The former has provided Nike with its own product catalog as evidence of infringement.

At present, Nike official website has no product named "Cool Compression".

But in Amazon's three party e-commerce platform, this expression still exists.

Lontex even claimed in the lawsuit that the company received inquiries from its professional sports team customers. Nike's products are very similar to Lontex, which is puzzling, but "performance is much worse."

According to the curiosity daily, Lontex asked the court to sentence Nike to pay $2 million for every infringing item.

As to whether the trademark infringement is established, it will remain the final judgment of the court.

In the past year, Nike has been repeatedly involved in trademark disputes.

The most important concern is that American photographer Jacobus Rentmeester sued Nike, saying that the prototype of the Jordan's flying trapeze was derived from his photography in 1984.

In February 2018, the court ruled that the infringement was not valid and Nike won the lawsuit.

The judge said that although his photography works are similar to the flying man logo, it does not mean that he owns the copyright of the logo.

In July 2018, the word "LDNR" appeared in an advertisement in Nike, referring to the abbreviation of Londoner, and was prosecuted by LNDR, a luxury sports brand in London.

In the end, the court said that Nike had searched trademark for 6 months before the advertisement was released, and learned that the "LNDR" trademark had been registered, but it still released the advertisement.

The court therefore decided that Nike's trademark infringement against LNDR was established and could no longer be used.

During the 2018 World Cup in Russia, Nike's world cup product series suffered a trademark setback.

The brand's brand name is alleged to have plagiarized the school logo of the Maryland Naval Academy. Nike's trademark pattern is a shield form, which is very similar to the logo of the Maryland Naval Academy of the United States.

Regarding this, the Maryland Naval Academy of the United States issued a statement on Twitter. "The similarities between the Nike logo issued this week and the United States Naval Academy are undeniable. We believe that according to the trademark law, their logo is obviously a tort.

The Naval Academy is working with the naval leadership to order Nike to stop using the logo.

Subsequently, Nike quickly removed trademark photos from social media, suspended the listing of related products, and made public an apology statement.

More interesting reports, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats net.

  • Related reading

Paris Spring And Paris Family Apologized For The "Discrimination Against The Chinese" On Sina Micro-Blog.

Case direct attack
|
2018/4/28 15:12:00
573

C Line, Creative Director Hedi Slimane Wins The Dispute With Kai Yun Again.

Case direct attack
|
2018/4/9 14:41:00
150

AI Chuo, Giorgio Armani And Other Light Luxury Clothing Quality Is Not Qualified On The "Black List".

Case direct attack
|
2018/1/29 20:43:00
130

A Ring Off The Mature Apparel Industry Chain: A Shop On The Road

Case direct attack
|
2017/12/21 21:05:00
116

Is Forever 21 Reclaiming The Gucci Striped Trademark Patent?

Case direct attack
|
2017/12/15 15:32:00
123
Read the next article

Chinese Spend Five Hundred Billion On Luxury Goods A Year, But Market Growth Is Slowing Down.

Recently, a number of first tier luxury brands have fallen in share prices. In the US, many stocks of light luxury Brand Company also suffered a sell-off. At the same time, the Hong Kong stock market