Supervision Should Be "Excessive": Excessive Regulation Is Not Conducive To The Healthy Development Of The Market.

Regulation is very necessary. Under the reasonable supervision mode, we can standardize the normal operation order of the market.

However, the size of supervision needs to take full account of the market capacity. Excessive regulation is not conducive to the healthy development of the market.

Tighter regulation is the most obvious feature of the recent market.

Affected by this, the concept of stocks with considerable profit effect has been hyped up, and the stock market has been flameout.

In fact, from the performance of the market in the near future, the index has fallen by more than 100 points, only about 4%, but the decline of the stock is quite fierce, and the stock of more than 30% in the short term is quite a few.

This shows that for the recent market situation, basically showing a "index down, the stock plummeted" pattern.

From the obstruction of the Xiong an concept stock to the pressure of the new shares, and then to the setbacks of high delivery and equity swap, this series of regulatory actions directly put the concept stocks of the market to be more enthusiastic.

Closely followed is the exacerbation of the sell-off, the successive fall of individual stocks, and the immediate extinguishing of the market earning effect, so that the index, which will face the upward trend, will once again return to its low running state.

It is worth mentioning that in recent years, the CBRC has issued relevant guidance to prevent and control risks in the banking sector, while management has accelerated the liquidation of some of the special account channels, but has intensified the willingness to sell some of the funds.

In addition, some regional characteristics such as obvious or abnormal pactions have been increased, while the Wenzhou Gang is the dominant group.

It was also affected.

During this period, the situation of "flash collapse" occurred frequently.

Heavy punches have eliminated obstacles to the healthy development of the market in the medium and long term, but the impact on the short-term market is still significant.

It can be understood that at present, over-the-counter funds are afraid to take a big look at the layout of the bottom line. They may still be worried about the timing of the regulatory policy. The tightness of regulation will also affect the willingness of the over-the-counter funds to bottom the floor in the future, and affect the future trend of the A share market.

At present, the A share market has entered the "strict supervision" mode, the illegal market as a whole.

Substantial improvements have been made.

Indeed, judging from the recent market performance, under strict supervision and high pressure, it has played a good deterrent role in illegal activities, and short-term speculation and abnormal pactions have also been slowed down to some extent.

For this immature A share market, regulation is very necessary. Under reasonable supervision mode, it is possible to standardize the normal operation order of the market.

But the size of supervision still needs to take full account of the market's ability to bear, excessive supervision and no supervision, but it is not conducive to the healthy development of the market.

Perhaps the measure of regulation really tests the wisdom of regulators.

At present, the A share market is still dominated by stock funds, and the expected influx of new liquidity depends on whether there is a continuous money making effect and changes in regulatory attitudes.

In other words, in the current market environment where there is no continuous money making effect, we should continue to strengthen supervision, strengthen the inquiry of high delivery and pfer programs and accelerate the stalling of popular varieties, and the willingness to bargain for off-site funds may also be greatly reduced.

Perhaps, for large capital institutions, they prefer to wait until the regulatory policy tends to stabilize and the market bubble is suppressed until the freezing point.

It is undeniable that the strict supervision mode is conducive to the long-term and healthy development of the stock market.

But in the process of strict supervision, we need to take full account of the market's own affordability and the vital interests of investors.

At the same time, we need to speed up the improvement of laws and regulations, and let the perfect securities law escort the healthy development of the stock market.

For more information, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats and Internet cafes.