Accepting Bribe &Nbsp Of The Brilliance Gold Cup Car, The Former Ministry Of Finance, Tax And Political Bureau Investigators Sacked.

Accept

Zhou took bribes from Bao, a director of the industrial policy office of Shenyang Brilliance Jinbei Automobile Co, which controls a company's special work expenses.

In early 2008, Bao was sentenced by Chaoyang Court for grabbing some of his funds in private pockets.

During his detention, Bao, a deputy investigator of the Ministry of finance, tax and taxation department, took part in the effort to punish criminals.

In 2000, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued documents to reduce the 30% consumption tax for the vehicle production enterprises which meet the emission standards.

Domestic automobile manufacturers can submit applications for reduction or exemption of consumption tax to the Ministry of finance.

At that time, Zhou was the person in charge of the work.

At the same time, Bao said that the relevant departments did not specify the time limit from the admissibility to the approval, and the person in charge could control it.

In 2003, he learned about Zhou, and in order to get the approval of the company as soon as possible, and to handle the formalities of tax reduction and exemption, he sought Zhou's help.

Zhou said he would rush ahead with the approval of the Brilliance Jinbei company.

In order to thank Zhou, Bao took the initiative to ask Zhou to take some invoices, and he reimbursed them.

In addition to reimbursement, the bag also gave Zhou a camera and mobile phone.

In 2004, Zhou said she wanted to buy a car, and hinted that she had seen a POLO car in Volkswagen, priced at around 140 thousand.

Bao Mou offered to sponsor 40 thousand yuan, and wrapped up the "sponsorship fee" in the newspaper, handed it to Zhou himself.

Court hearing

Zhou is a state worker who has taken advantage of his duty to illegally receive money from others and seek benefits for others, which has constituted a crime of bribery.

In view of the defendant's active return of the stolen goods and his guilt of repentance, he should be given a lighter punishment and suspended sentence as appropriate.